Languages as public goods and language ...
Type de document :
Partie d'ouvrage
DOI :
Titre :
Languages as public goods and language change as a tragedy of the commons
Auteur(s) :
Éditeur(s) ou directeur(s) scientifique(s) :
Enke
Dankmar W. (Editor)
Hyman
Larry M. (Editor)
Nichols
Johanna (Editor)
Seiler
Guido (Editor)
Weber
Thilo (Editor)
Hölzl
Andreas (Editor)
Dankmar W. (Editor)
Hyman
Larry M. (Editor)
Nichols
Johanna (Editor)
Seiler
Guido (Editor)
Weber
Thilo (Editor)
Hölzl
Andreas (Editor)
Titre de l’ouvrage :
Language Change for the Worse
Éditeur :
Language Science Press
Date de publication :
2024
ISBN :
978-3-96110-317-1
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
Tragedy of the Commons
Language change
Speaker interest
Hearer interest
Conflict
Language change
Speaker interest
Hearer interest
Conflict
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Linguistique
Résumé en anglais : [en]
This paper makes three claims: first, that constructions in languages can be largely analyzed as public goods; second, that in cases where this is not true, they are common pool resources; and third, that in communication, ...
Lire la suite >This paper makes three claims: first, that constructions in languages can be largely analyzed as public goods; second, that in cases where this is not true, they are common pool resources; and third, that in communication, there are systematic and intrinsic conflicts between speaker and hearer, such that in some cases, those conflicts will lead to a tragedy of the commons. It will be argued that at least some instances of language change can be seen as cases where short-term speaker interests impose costs on short-term hearer interests, and that in the long run, they also go against the best interests of speakers.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >This paper makes three claims: first, that constructions in languages can be largely analyzed as public goods; second, that in cases where this is not true, they are common pool resources; and third, that in communication, there are systematic and intrinsic conflicts between speaker and hearer, such that in some cases, those conflicts will lead to a tragedy of the commons. It will be argued that at least some instances of language change can be seen as cases where short-term speaker interests impose costs on short-term hearer interests, and that in the long run, they also go against the best interests of speakers.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Collections :
Source :
Fichiers
- document
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document
- 292-EnkeEtAl-2024-12.pdf
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document