Injury risk factors, screening tests and ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article de synthèse/Review paper
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Injury risk factors, screening tests and preventative strategies: a systematic review of the evidence that underpins the perceptions and practices of 44 football (soccer) teams from various premier leagues
Auteur(s) :
Mccall, Alan [Auteur]
Université de Lille, Droit et Santé
Carling, Chris [Auteur]
University of Central Lancashire [Preston] [UCLAN]
Davison, Michael [Auteur]
Nédélec, Mathieu [Auteur]
Université de Lille, Droit et Santé
Le Gall, Franck [Auteur]
Berthoin, Serge [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369 - ULR 4488 [URePSSS]
Dupont, Gregory [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369 - ULR 4488 [URePSSS]
Université de Lille, Droit et Santé
Carling, Chris [Auteur]
University of Central Lancashire [Preston] [UCLAN]
Davison, Michael [Auteur]
Nédélec, Mathieu [Auteur]
Université de Lille, Droit et Santé
Le Gall, Franck [Auteur]
Berthoin, Serge [Auteur]
![refId](/themes/Mirage2//images/idref.png)
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369 - ULR 4488 [URePSSS]
Dupont, Gregory [Auteur]
![refId](/themes/Mirage2//images/idref.png)
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369 - ULR 4488 [URePSSS]
Titre de la revue :
British journal of sports medicine
Nom court de la revue :
Br. J. Sports Med.
Numéro :
49
Pagination :
583-U40
Date de publication :
2015-05-01
ISSN :
0306-3674
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
Mesh:Soccer/injuries*
Mesh:Surveys and Questionnaires
Mesh:Muscle
Mesh:Skeletal/physiology
Mesh:Muscle
Mesh:Skeletal/injuries
Mesh:Athletic Injuries/prevention & control
Mesh:Muscle Strength/physiology
Mesh:Proprioception/physiology
Mesh:Risk Assessment
Mesh:Humans
Mesh:Health Knowledge
Mesh:Attitudes
Mesh:Practice
Mesh:Fatigue/etiology
Mesh:Exercise Therapy/methods
Mesh:Evidence-Based Medicine
Mesh:Early Diagnosis
Mesh:Postural Balance/physiology
Mesh:Risk Factors
Mesh:Surveys and Questionnaires
Mesh:Muscle
Mesh:Skeletal/physiology
Mesh:Muscle
Mesh:Skeletal/injuries
Mesh:Athletic Injuries/prevention & control
Mesh:Muscle Strength/physiology
Mesh:Proprioception/physiology
Mesh:Risk Assessment
Mesh:Humans
Mesh:Health Knowledge
Mesh:Attitudes
Mesh:Practice
Mesh:Fatigue/etiology
Mesh:Exercise Therapy/methods
Mesh:Evidence-Based Medicine
Mesh:Early Diagnosis
Mesh:Postural Balance/physiology
Mesh:Risk Factors
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
Résumé en anglais : [en]
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the scientific level of evidence for the 'Top 3' risk factors, screening tests and preventative exercises identified by a previously published survey of 44 premier league football (soccer) ...
Lire la suite >OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the scientific level of evidence for the 'Top 3' risk factors, screening tests and preventative exercises identified by a previously published survey of 44 premier league football (soccer) teams. Also, to provide an overall scientific level of evidence and graded recommendation based on the current research literature. METHODS: A systematic literature search (Pubmed [MEDLINE], SportDiscus, PEDRO and Cochrane databases). The quality of the articles was assessed and a level of evidence (1++ to 4) was assigned. Level 1++ corresponded to the highest level of evidence available and 4, the lowest. A graded recommendation (A: strong, B: moderate, C: weak, D: insufficient evidence to assign a specific recommendation) for use in the practical setting was given. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were analysed. The overall level of evidence for the risk factors previous injury, fatigue and muscle imbalance were 2++, 4 and 'inconclusive', respectively. The graded recommendation for functional movement screen, psychological questionnaire and isokinetic muscle testing were all 'D'. Hamstring eccentric had a weak graded 'C' recommendation, and eccentric exercise for other body parts was 'D'. Balance/proprioception exercise to reduce ankle and knee sprain injury was assigned a graded recommendation 'D'. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of perceptions and practices of premier league teams have a low level of evidence and low graded recommendation. This does not imply that these perceptions and practices are not important or not valid, as it may simply be that they are yet to be sufficiently validated or refuted by research.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the scientific level of evidence for the 'Top 3' risk factors, screening tests and preventative exercises identified by a previously published survey of 44 premier league football (soccer) teams. Also, to provide an overall scientific level of evidence and graded recommendation based on the current research literature. METHODS: A systematic literature search (Pubmed [MEDLINE], SportDiscus, PEDRO and Cochrane databases). The quality of the articles was assessed and a level of evidence (1++ to 4) was assigned. Level 1++ corresponded to the highest level of evidence available and 4, the lowest. A graded recommendation (A: strong, B: moderate, C: weak, D: insufficient evidence to assign a specific recommendation) for use in the practical setting was given. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were analysed. The overall level of evidence for the risk factors previous injury, fatigue and muscle imbalance were 2++, 4 and 'inconclusive', respectively. The graded recommendation for functional movement screen, psychological questionnaire and isokinetic muscle testing were all 'D'. Hamstring eccentric had a weak graded 'C' recommendation, and eccentric exercise for other body parts was 'D'. Balance/proprioception exercise to reduce ankle and knee sprain injury was assigned a graded recommendation 'D'. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of perceptions and practices of premier league teams have a low level of evidence and low graded recommendation. This does not imply that these perceptions and practices are not important or not valid, as it may simply be that they are yet to be sufficiently validated or refuted by research.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
Univ. Littoral Côte d’Opale
Univ. Artois
Université de Lille
Univ. Artois
Université de Lille
Équipe(s) de recherche :
Activité Physique, Muscle, Santé (APMS)
Date de dépôt :
2019-09-24T07:29:22Z
2020-03-25T13:48:58Z
2020-03-25T13:48:58Z
Fichiers
- Injury risk factors.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document