Injury risk factors, screening tests and ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article de synthèse/Review paper
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
Injury risk factors, screening tests and preventative strategies: a systematic review of the evidence that underpins the perceptions and practices of 44 football (soccer) teams from various premier leagues
Author(s) :
Mccall, Alan [Auteur]
Université de Lille, Droit et Santé
Carling, Chris [Auteur]
University of Central Lancashire [Preston] [UCLAN]
Davison, Michael [Auteur]
Nédélec, Mathieu [Auteur]
Université de Lille, Droit et Santé
Le Gall, Franck [Auteur]
Berthoin, Serge [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369 - ULR 4488 [URePSSS]
Dupont, Gregory [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - EA 7369
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369 - ULR 4488 [URePSSS]
Université de Lille, Droit et Santé
Carling, Chris [Auteur]
University of Central Lancashire [Preston] [UCLAN]
Davison, Michael [Auteur]
Nédélec, Mathieu [Auteur]
Université de Lille, Droit et Santé
Le Gall, Franck [Auteur]
Berthoin, Serge [Auteur]

Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369 - ULR 4488 [URePSSS]
Dupont, Gregory [Auteur]

Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - EA 7369
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369 - ULR 4488 [URePSSS]
Journal title :
British journal of sports medicine
Abbreviated title :
Br. J. Sports Med.
Volume number :
49
Pages :
583-U40
Publication date :
2015-05-01
ISSN :
0306-3674
English keyword(s) :
Mesh:Soccer/injuries*
Mesh:Surveys and Questionnaires
Mesh:Muscle
Mesh:Skeletal/physiology
Mesh:Muscle
Mesh:Skeletal/injuries
Mesh:Athletic Injuries/prevention & control
Mesh:Muscle Strength/physiology
Mesh:Proprioception/physiology
Mesh:Risk Assessment
Mesh:Humans
Mesh:Health Knowledge
Mesh:Attitudes
Mesh:Practice
Mesh:Fatigue/etiology
Mesh:Exercise Therapy/methods
Mesh:Evidence-Based Medicine
Mesh:Early Diagnosis
Mesh:Postural Balance/physiology
Mesh:Risk Factors
Mesh:Surveys and Questionnaires
Mesh:Muscle
Mesh:Skeletal/physiology
Mesh:Muscle
Mesh:Skeletal/injuries
Mesh:Athletic Injuries/prevention & control
Mesh:Muscle Strength/physiology
Mesh:Proprioception/physiology
Mesh:Risk Assessment
Mesh:Humans
Mesh:Health Knowledge
Mesh:Attitudes
Mesh:Practice
Mesh:Fatigue/etiology
Mesh:Exercise Therapy/methods
Mesh:Evidence-Based Medicine
Mesh:Early Diagnosis
Mesh:Postural Balance/physiology
Mesh:Risk Factors
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the scientific level of evidence for the 'Top 3' risk factors, screening tests and preventative exercises identified by a previously published survey of 44 premier league football (soccer) ...
Show more >OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the scientific level of evidence for the 'Top 3' risk factors, screening tests and preventative exercises identified by a previously published survey of 44 premier league football (soccer) teams. Also, to provide an overall scientific level of evidence and graded recommendation based on the current research literature. METHODS: A systematic literature search (Pubmed [MEDLINE], SportDiscus, PEDRO and Cochrane databases). The quality of the articles was assessed and a level of evidence (1++ to 4) was assigned. Level 1++ corresponded to the highest level of evidence available and 4, the lowest. A graded recommendation (A: strong, B: moderate, C: weak, D: insufficient evidence to assign a specific recommendation) for use in the practical setting was given. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were analysed. The overall level of evidence for the risk factors previous injury, fatigue and muscle imbalance were 2++, 4 and 'inconclusive', respectively. The graded recommendation for functional movement screen, psychological questionnaire and isokinetic muscle testing were all 'D'. Hamstring eccentric had a weak graded 'C' recommendation, and eccentric exercise for other body parts was 'D'. Balance/proprioception exercise to reduce ankle and knee sprain injury was assigned a graded recommendation 'D'. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of perceptions and practices of premier league teams have a low level of evidence and low graded recommendation. This does not imply that these perceptions and practices are not important or not valid, as it may simply be that they are yet to be sufficiently validated or refuted by research.Show less >
Show more >OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the scientific level of evidence for the 'Top 3' risk factors, screening tests and preventative exercises identified by a previously published survey of 44 premier league football (soccer) teams. Also, to provide an overall scientific level of evidence and graded recommendation based on the current research literature. METHODS: A systematic literature search (Pubmed [MEDLINE], SportDiscus, PEDRO and Cochrane databases). The quality of the articles was assessed and a level of evidence (1++ to 4) was assigned. Level 1++ corresponded to the highest level of evidence available and 4, the lowest. A graded recommendation (A: strong, B: moderate, C: weak, D: insufficient evidence to assign a specific recommendation) for use in the practical setting was given. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were analysed. The overall level of evidence for the risk factors previous injury, fatigue and muscle imbalance were 2++, 4 and 'inconclusive', respectively. The graded recommendation for functional movement screen, psychological questionnaire and isokinetic muscle testing were all 'D'. Hamstring eccentric had a weak graded 'C' recommendation, and eccentric exercise for other body parts was 'D'. Balance/proprioception exercise to reduce ankle and knee sprain injury was assigned a graded recommendation 'D'. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of perceptions and practices of premier league teams have a low level of evidence and low graded recommendation. This does not imply that these perceptions and practices are not important or not valid, as it may simply be that they are yet to be sufficiently validated or refuted by research.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
Univ. Littoral Côte d’Opale
Univ. Artois
Université de Lille
Univ. Artois
Université de Lille
Research team(s) :
Activité Physique, Muscle, Santé (APMS)
Submission date :
2019-09-24T07:29:22Z
2020-03-25T13:48:58Z
2020-03-25T13:48:58Z
Files
- Injury risk factors.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Open access
- Access the document
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States