¿Democratiza el sorteo la democracia? Cómo ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique
DOI :
Permalink :
Title :
¿Democratiza el sorteo la democracia? Cómo la democracia deliberativa ha despolitizado una propuesta radical
Author(s) :
Talpin, Julien [Auteur]
Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches Administratives, Politiques et Sociales - UMR 8026 [CERAPS]
Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches Administratives, Politiques et Sociales - UMR 8026 [CERAPS]
Journal title :
Daimon, Revista Internacional de Filosofía
Volume number :
72
Pages :
187-203
Publisher :
Departamento de Filosofía de la Universidad de Murcia
Publication date :
2017-12-01
ISSN :
1130-0507
Keyword(s) :
History of ideas and knowledge
Deliberation
Deliberative Democracy
Random selection
Sorteo
Democracia deliberativa
Post-democracia
Participación política
Teoría crítica
Deliberation
Deliberative Democracy
Random selection
Sorteo
Democracia deliberativa
Post-democracia
Participación política
Teoría crítica
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Science politique
English abstract : [en]
Random selection grand come-back in politics in the last forty years is partly due to its incorporation by the theories of deliberative democracy, that have made of randomly selected devices the central forums of deliberation. ...
Show more >Random selection grand come-back in politics in the last forty years is partly due to its incorporation by the theories of deliberative democracy, that have made of randomly selected devices the central forums of deliberation. This integration was, however, far from being self-evident. It stemmed from the scientific trajectory of its proponents and from parallel trends in the political field. Despite, the fresh air random selection brings to representative government, its scientific promotion has not necessarily meant a democratization of democracy however. While such experiments have demonstrated the deliberative capacities of ordinary citizens, they have only exceptionally increased their power in decision-making processes. The focus put by research on the analysis of deliberative dynamics within randomly selected devices has therefore been harshly criticized by some deliberativists who reclaim a needed come back to Habermas’ initial inspiration of a greater deliberation in the public sphere rather than confined in mini-publics. This systemic turn has marginalized random selection within the most recent deliberative theories. After tracing back this intellectual path, I sketch some arguments about the way random selection could rekindle the critical spirit of deliberative theory, mainly through its oppositional use by social movement.Show less >
Show more >Random selection grand come-back in politics in the last forty years is partly due to its incorporation by the theories of deliberative democracy, that have made of randomly selected devices the central forums of deliberation. This integration was, however, far from being self-evident. It stemmed from the scientific trajectory of its proponents and from parallel trends in the political field. Despite, the fresh air random selection brings to representative government, its scientific promotion has not necessarily meant a democratization of democracy however. While such experiments have demonstrated the deliberative capacities of ordinary citizens, they have only exceptionally increased their power in decision-making processes. The focus put by research on the analysis of deliberative dynamics within randomly selected devices has therefore been harshly criticized by some deliberativists who reclaim a needed come back to Habermas’ initial inspiration of a greater deliberation in the public sphere rather than confined in mini-publics. This systemic turn has marginalized random selection within the most recent deliberative theories. After tracing back this intellectual path, I sketch some arguments about the way random selection could rekindle the critical spirit of deliberative theory, mainly through its oppositional use by social movement.Show less >
Language :
Espagnol
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
CNRS
Université de Lille
Université de Lille
Collections :
Submission date :
2019-10-29T11:37:07Z
2019-10-29T14:31:43Z
2021-12-17T15:27:40Z
2019-10-29T14:31:43Z
2021-12-17T15:27:40Z
Files
- document
- Open access
- Access the document