Are abdominal aortic aneurysm screening ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Are abdominal aortic aneurysm screening guidelines followed? prospective study in dunkerque''s hospital emergency room
Auteur(s) :
Bearez, C. [Auteur]
Puszkarek, T. [Auteur]
Couturier, Christophe [Auteur]
Rochoy, Michael [Auteur]
Faculté de Médecine Henri Warembourg - Université de Lille
Puszkarek, T. [Auteur]
Couturier, Christophe [Auteur]
Rochoy, Michael [Auteur]
Faculté de Médecine Henri Warembourg - Université de Lille
Titre de la revue :
Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angéiologie
Nom court de la revue :
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris)
Date de publication :
2019-01-25
ISSN :
1768-3181
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
Résumé en anglais : [en]
OBJECTIVE: Are the recommendations issued by the Haute Autorité de santé in 2012 on screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) being applied?
METHODS: We interviewed the target patients, ex. male patients aged 65 to ...
Lire la suite >OBJECTIVE: Are the recommendations issued by the Haute Autorité de santé in 2012 on screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) being applied? METHODS: We interviewed the target patients, ex. male patients aged 65 to 75, smokers or former smokers, or as young as 50 in the event of a family history of AAA in the parents or siblings, entering the emergency room of Dunkerque between May 7 and December 31, 2015. We asked them if they had had an abdominal aortic ultrasound, or an abdominal ultrasound, or an arterial Doppler ultrasound of the lower limbs, and when, to see if they had had an AAA test since November 2012. RESULTS: We included 55 patients and excluded 5 of 180 eligible patients (31 %). It was not possible to conclude for 4 patients due to missing data. Thirteen of 46 patients (28.3 %, 95 % CI [16.0-43.5]) have had AAA ultrasound screening since November 2012; 33 have not (71.7 %, 95 % CI [56.5-84.0]) and no screening was offered. Of the 13 patients screened, 7 were screened by the attending physician (53.9 %, 95 % CI [25.1-80.8]) and 6 by another specialist (46.2 %, 95 % CI [19.2-74.9]). CONCLUSIONS: AAA screening in our population is low. Physicians should be urged to publicize and implement the November 2012 French recommendations to reduce AAA-related mortality.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >OBJECTIVE: Are the recommendations issued by the Haute Autorité de santé in 2012 on screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) being applied? METHODS: We interviewed the target patients, ex. male patients aged 65 to 75, smokers or former smokers, or as young as 50 in the event of a family history of AAA in the parents or siblings, entering the emergency room of Dunkerque between May 7 and December 31, 2015. We asked them if they had had an abdominal aortic ultrasound, or an abdominal ultrasound, or an arterial Doppler ultrasound of the lower limbs, and when, to see if they had had an AAA test since November 2012. RESULTS: We included 55 patients and excluded 5 of 180 eligible patients (31 %). It was not possible to conclude for 4 patients due to missing data. Thirteen of 46 patients (28.3 %, 95 % CI [16.0-43.5]) have had AAA ultrasound screening since November 2012; 33 have not (71.7 %, 95 % CI [56.5-84.0]) and no screening was offered. Of the 13 patients screened, 7 were screened by the attending physician (53.9 %, 95 % CI [25.1-80.8]) and 6 by another specialist (46.2 %, 95 % CI [19.2-74.9]). CONCLUSIONS: AAA screening in our population is low. Physicians should be urged to publicize and implement the November 2012 French recommendations to reduce AAA-related mortality.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
CHU Lille
Université de Lille
Université de Lille
Date de dépôt :
2019-12-09T16:48:25Z
2024-04-03T10:36:11Z
2024-04-03T10:36:11Z