• English
    • français
  • Help
  •  | 
  • Contact
  •  | 
  • About
  •  | 
  • Login
  • HAL portal
  •  | 
  • Pages Pro
  • EN
  •  / 
  • FR
View Item 
  •   LillOA Home
  • Liste des unités
  • Territoires, Villes, Environnement & Société (TVES) - ULR 4477
  • View Item
  •   LillOA Home
  • Liste des unités
  • Territoires, Villes, Environnement & Société (TVES) - ULR 4477
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Physical activity using wrist-worn ...
  • BibTeX
  • CSV
  • Excel
  • RIS

Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique
DOI :
10.1111/cpf.12337
PMID :
26749436
Title :
Physical activity using wrist-worn accelerometers: comparison of dominant and non-dominant wrist
Author(s) :
Dieu, Olivier [Auteur]
Territoires, Villes, Environnement & Société - ULR 4477 [TVES]
Mikulovic, Jacques [Auteur]
Laboratoire Cultures, Éducation, Sociétés [LACES]
Fardy, Paul S [Auteur]
Bui-Xuan, Gilles [Auteur]
Université de Lille, Droit et Santé
Beghin, Laurent [Auteur]
Centre d'Investigation Clinique - Innovation Technologique de Lille - CIC 1403 - CIC 9301 [CIC Lille]
Lille Inflammation Research International Center - U 995 [LIRIC]
Vanhelst, Jeremy [Auteur] refId
Centre d'Investigation Clinique - Innovation Technologique de Lille - CIC 1403 - CIC 9301 [CIC Lille]
Laboratoire Cultures, Éducation, Sociétés [LACES]
Lille Inflammation Research International Center - U 995 [LIRIC]
Journal title :
Clinical physiology and functional imaging
Pages :
525-529
Publisher :
Wiley
Publication date :
2017
ISSN :
1475-0961
English keyword(s) :
health
methodology
physical patterns
accelerometry
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Médecine humaine et pathologie/Physiologie [q-bio.TO]
English abstract : [en]
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in physical activity assessment between a wrist‐worn accelerometer at the dominant or non‐dominant arm. The secondary purpose was to assess the ...
Show more >
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in physical activity assessment between a wrist‐worn accelerometer at the dominant or non‐dominant arm. The secondary purpose was to assess the concurrent validity of measures of physical activity from the wrist‐worn accelerometer and the waist‐worn accelerometer. Forty adults wore three accelerometers simultaneously, one on the waist and one each on the non‐dominant wrist and dominant wrist, respectively, for 24 consecutive hours of free‐living conditions. Data were uploaded from the monitor to a computer following a 1‐day test period. There were no significant differences in physical activity when comparing the dominant versus the non‐dominant wrist, regardless of axis (P>0·05). Mean daily accelerometer output data from both wrists were strongly correlated with average counts per minute from the ActiGraph worn around the waist (r = 0·88, P<0·001). Findings suggest that the choice to wear the accelerometer on the non‐dominant or dominant wrist has no impact on results. Data from this study contribute to the knowledge of how to best assess physical activity habits.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Peer reviewed article :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Collections :
  • Territoires, Villes, Environnement & Société (TVES) - ULR 4477
Source :
Harvested from HAL
Files
Thumbnail
  • https://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-02177206/document
  • Open access
  • Access the document
Thumbnail
  • https://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-02177206/document
  • Open access
  • Access the document
Université de Lille

Mentions légales
Université de Lille © 2017