What do we call post-apartheid?
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
URL permanente :
Titre :
What do we call post-apartheid?
Auteur(s) :
HAYEM, JUDITH [Auteur]
Centre Lillois d’Études et de Recherches Sociologiques et Économiques - UMR 8019 [CLERSÉ]
Centre Lillois d’Études et de Recherches Sociologiques et Économiques - UMR 8019 [CLERSÉ]
Titre de la revue :
Social Dynamics
Nom court de la revue :
Social Dynamics
Numéro :
43
Pagination :
386-402
Éditeur :
Informa UK Limited
Date de publication :
2017-09-02
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
post apartheid
rupture
sequence
political subjectivities
political anthropology
rupture
sequence
political subjectivities
political anthropology
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Sociologie
Résumé en anglais : [en]
In this paper, the author examines the different uses and meanings of the usual expression “post-apartheid.” It has been used extensively in the social sciences, political discourse and the media since the mid-1980s. But ...
Lire la suite >In this paper, the author examines the different uses and meanings of the usual expression “post-apartheid.” It has been used extensively in the social sciences, political discourse and the media since the mid-1980s. But what does it refer to, and has it always meant the same thing over the last 20 years? To answer that question, the author reviews the different ways she has used the notion in her research into workers’ forms of thinking and political subjectivities in South Africa since 1996. She distinguishes between its use as a chronological marker, an academic concept open to various problematics and epistemological decisions and a notion used by interviewees under various acceptations. She concentrates more specifically on the sequential implications of the adverb “post” in her work and argues that there have been political sequences in what she (with others) has named “post-apartheid.” She concludes that she intends to stop using this term in order to concentrate on identifying the current political sequence in South Africa.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >In this paper, the author examines the different uses and meanings of the usual expression “post-apartheid.” It has been used extensively in the social sciences, political discourse and the media since the mid-1980s. But what does it refer to, and has it always meant the same thing over the last 20 years? To answer that question, the author reviews the different ways she has used the notion in her research into workers’ forms of thinking and political subjectivities in South Africa since 1996. She distinguishes between its use as a chronological marker, an academic concept open to various problematics and epistemological decisions and a notion used by interviewees under various acceptations. She concentrates more specifically on the sequential implications of the adverb “post” in her work and argues that there have been political sequences in what she (with others) has named “post-apartheid.” She concludes that she intends to stop using this term in order to concentrate on identifying the current political sequence in South Africa.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Français
Français
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
Univ. Littoral Côte d’Opale
CNRS
Univ. Littoral Côte d’Opale
Collections :
Équipe(s) de recherche :
Ancrages et dynamiques comparés du politique
Date de dépôt :
2020-12-11T11:09:28Z
2021-01-07T13:53:19Z
2021-01-07T13:53:19Z