The use and nature of grapheme coding ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
The use and nature of grapheme coding during sub-lexical processing and lexical access
Author(s) :
Commissaire, Eva [Auteur]
Laboratoire de Psychologie des Cognitions [LPC]
Casalis, Severine [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Laboratoire de Psychologie des Cognitions [LPC]
Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193
Laboratoire de Psychologie des Cognitions [LPC]
Casalis, Severine [Auteur]

Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Laboratoire de Psychologie des Cognitions [LPC]
Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193
Journal title :
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Abbreviated title :
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)
Volume number :
71
Pages :
1324-1339
Publication date :
2018-01-01
ISSN :
1747-0226
English keyword(s) :
Visual word recognition
Grapheme coding
Sub-lexical orthographic units
Letter detection task
Grapheme coding
Sub-lexical orthographic units
Letter detection task
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences cognitives
English abstract : [en]
This work aimed to investigate grapheme coding during sub-lexical processing and lexical access. Using the letter detection task in Experiment 1, we compared letter pairs that could be considered as a grapheme unit or not ...
Show more >This work aimed to investigate grapheme coding during sub-lexical processing and lexical access. Using the letter detection task in Experiment 1, we compared letter pairs that could be considered as a grapheme unit or not depending on context (referred to as weakly cohesive complex, e.g. an in chant vs. cane) to real two-letter graphemes (highly cohesive complex, e.g. au in chaud) and single-letter graphemes (simple, e.g. a in place). Three experimental conditions were used, one of which was designed to prevent phonological influences. Data revealed that only highly cohesive complex graphemes were processed as units, not the weakly cohesive ones. The same pattern was found across experimental conditions, in favor of an orthographic mechanism. In Experiments 2 and 3, a primed lexical decision task was used with two SOAs and two different ranges of lexical frequency. We manipulated the number of graphemes removed from partial primes (d**che vs. do**he-DOUCHE) and relatedness. In contrast with Experiment 1, no evidence was provided in favor of a role of graphemes during lexical access. We suggest that graphemes can be conceived as sub-lexical orthographic units per se but can only be captured within a sub-lexical route to reading.Show less >
Show more >This work aimed to investigate grapheme coding during sub-lexical processing and lexical access. Using the letter detection task in Experiment 1, we compared letter pairs that could be considered as a grapheme unit or not depending on context (referred to as weakly cohesive complex, e.g. an in chant vs. cane) to real two-letter graphemes (highly cohesive complex, e.g. au in chaud) and single-letter graphemes (simple, e.g. a in place). Three experimental conditions were used, one of which was designed to prevent phonological influences. Data revealed that only highly cohesive complex graphemes were processed as units, not the weakly cohesive ones. The same pattern was found across experimental conditions, in favor of an orthographic mechanism. In Experiments 2 and 3, a primed lexical decision task was used with two SOAs and two different ranges of lexical frequency. We manipulated the number of graphemes removed from partial primes (d**che vs. do**he-DOUCHE) and relatedness. In contrast with Experiment 1, no evidence was provided in favor of a role of graphemes during lexical access. We suggest that graphemes can be conceived as sub-lexical orthographic units per se but can only be captured within a sub-lexical route to reading.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
Research team(s) :
Équipe Langage
Submission date :
2019-02-13T14:17:53Z
2020-04-20T12:04:44Z
2021-01-25T13:37:26Z
2020-04-20T12:04:44Z
2021-01-25T13:37:26Z
Files
- Commissaire Casalis 2018 QJEP LillOA.pdf
- Version finale acceptée pour publication (postprint)
- Open access
- Access the document