Orthographic consistency influences ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
DOI :
Permalink :
Title :
Orthographic consistency influences morphological processing in reading aloud: Evidence from a cross-linguistic study
Author(s) :
Mousikou, Petroula [Auteur]
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Beyersmann, Elisabeth [Auteur]
Laboratoire de psychologie cognitive [LPC]
Ktori, Maria [Auteur]
Laboratoire de psychologie cognitive [LPC]
Javourey - Drevet, Ludivine [Auteur]
Apprentissage, Didactique, Evaluation, Formation [ADEF]
Laboratoire de psychologie cognitive [LPC]
Crepaldi, Davide [Auteur]
Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati / International School for Advanced Studies [SISSA / ISAS]
Ziegler, Johannes C. [Auteur]
Laboratoire de psychologie cognitive [LPC]
Grainger, Jonathan [Auteur]
Laboratoire de psychologie cognitive [LPC]
Schroeder, Sascha [Auteur]
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Beyersmann, Elisabeth [Auteur]
Laboratoire de psychologie cognitive [LPC]
Ktori, Maria [Auteur]
Laboratoire de psychologie cognitive [LPC]
Javourey - Drevet, Ludivine [Auteur]

Apprentissage, Didactique, Evaluation, Formation [ADEF]
Laboratoire de psychologie cognitive [LPC]
Crepaldi, Davide [Auteur]
Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati / International School for Advanced Studies [SISSA / ISAS]
Ziegler, Johannes C. [Auteur]
Laboratoire de psychologie cognitive [LPC]
Grainger, Jonathan [Auteur]
Laboratoire de psychologie cognitive [LPC]
Schroeder, Sascha [Auteur]
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Journal title :
Developmental Science
Abbreviated title :
Dev Sci
Publisher :
Wiley
Publication date :
2020-03-12
ISSN :
1363-755X
Keyword(s) :
Cross-linguistic
Morphology
Orthographic consistency
Reading acquisition
Cross\u2010linguistic
Morphology
Orthographic consistency
Reading acquisition
Cross\u2010linguistic
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Education
English abstract : [en]
The present study investigated whether morphological processing in reading is influenced by the orthographic consistency of a language or its morphological complexity. Developing readers in Grade 3 and skilled adult readers ...
Show more >The present study investigated whether morphological processing in reading is influenced by the orthographic consistency of a language or its morphological complexity. Developing readers in Grade 3 and skilled adult readers participated in a reading aloud task in four alphabetic orthographies (English, French, German, Italian), which differ in terms of both orthographic consistency and morphological complexity. English is the least consistent, in terms of its spelling\u2010to\u2010sound relationships, as well as the most morphologically sparse, compared to the other three. Two opposing hypotheses were formulated. If orthographic consistency modulated the use of morphology in reading, readers of English should show more robust morphological processing than readers of the other three languages, because morphological units increase the reliability of spelling\u2010to\u2010sound mappings in the English language. In contrast, if the use of morphology in reading depended on the morphological complexity of a language, readers of French, German, and Italian should process morphological units in printed letter strings more efficiently than readers of English. Both developing and skilled readers of English showed greater morphological processing than readers of the other three languages. These results support the idea that the orthographic consistency of a language, rather than its morphological complexity, influences the extent to which morphology is used during reading. We explain our findings within the remit of extant theories of reading acquisition and outline their theoretical and educational implicationsShow less >
Show more >The present study investigated whether morphological processing in reading is influenced by the orthographic consistency of a language or its morphological complexity. Developing readers in Grade 3 and skilled adult readers participated in a reading aloud task in four alphabetic orthographies (English, French, German, Italian), which differ in terms of both orthographic consistency and morphological complexity. English is the least consistent, in terms of its spelling\u2010to\u2010sound relationships, as well as the most morphologically sparse, compared to the other three. Two opposing hypotheses were formulated. If orthographic consistency modulated the use of morphology in reading, readers of English should show more robust morphological processing than readers of the other three languages, because morphological units increase the reliability of spelling\u2010to\u2010sound mappings in the English language. In contrast, if the use of morphology in reading depended on the morphological complexity of a language, readers of French, German, and Italian should process morphological units in printed letter strings more efficiently than readers of English. Both developing and skilled readers of English showed greater morphological processing than readers of the other three languages. These results support the idea that the orthographic consistency of a language, rather than its morphological complexity, influences the extent to which morphology is used during reading. We explain our findings within the remit of extant theories of reading acquisition and outline their theoretical and educational implicationsShow less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
ANR Project :
Administrative institution(s) :
Université de Lille
Collections :
Submission date :
2022-05-04T15:04:49Z
2022-06-07T13:53:42Z
2022-07-05T09:27:12Z
2022-06-07T13:53:42Z
2022-07-05T09:27:12Z
Files
- document
- Open access
- Access the document