Préserver la nature ou se révolter pour ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
Titre :
Préserver la nature ou se révolter pour le vivant ?
Complément de titre :
Enjeux politiques de la protection de la nature
Auteur(s) :
De Saint Phalle, Blaise [Auteur]
Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL) - UMR 8163 [STL]
Université de Lille
Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL) - UMR 8163 [STL]
Université de Lille
Titre de la revue :
Eco-ethica
Pagination :
23–42
Éditeur :
Tomonobu Imamichi Institute for Eco-ethica
Date de publication :
2023
ISSN :
2186-4802
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
nature
the living
preservation
environmental justice
resistance
revolt
the living
preservation
environmental justice
resistance
revolt
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Should we preserve nature or revolt in order to protect “the living” (“le vivant”)? At first sight, this invites a comparison between two ways and means of protecting nature. However, this article will defend the thesis ...
Lire la suite >Should we preserve nature or revolt in order to protect “the living” (“le vivant”)? At first sight, this invites a comparison between two ways and means of protecting nature. However, this article will defend the thesis that these two methods of protecting nature do not rest upon the same conception of our position, as human beings, towards the living. Indeed, in the end, we find an underlying opposition between nature, conceived as savage or as radical alterity (often inspired by the culturally loaded notion of wilderness, as found in the politics of preservation of vulnerable natural spaces) and the notion of “the living.” I intend to use the concept of the living in order to emphasize “ordinary nature” and our strong connection with all other living things. This reflection will enable me to defend the connection between the fight for environmental justice (namely revolt or resistance movements on the part of the poorest populations defending their living environment and their resources against an unequal production system) and the struggle for the protection of vulnerable living spaces and species.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Should we preserve nature or revolt in order to protect “the living” (“le vivant”)? At first sight, this invites a comparison between two ways and means of protecting nature. However, this article will defend the thesis that these two methods of protecting nature do not rest upon the same conception of our position, as human beings, towards the living. Indeed, in the end, we find an underlying opposition between nature, conceived as savage or as radical alterity (often inspired by the culturally loaded notion of wilderness, as found in the politics of preservation of vulnerable natural spaces) and the notion of “the living.” I intend to use the concept of the living in order to emphasize “ordinary nature” and our strong connection with all other living things. This reflection will enable me to defend the connection between the fight for environmental justice (namely revolt or resistance movements on the part of the poorest populations defending their living environment and their resources against an unequal production system) and the struggle for the protection of vulnerable living spaces and species.Lire moins >
Langue :
Français
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Collections :
Source :