The English privative prefixes near-, ...
Document type :
Compte-rendu et recension critique d'ouvrage
DOI :
Title :
The English privative prefixes near-, pseudo- and quasi-: Approximation and ‘disproximation’
Author(s) :
Cappelle, Bert [Auteur]
Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL) - UMR 8163 [STL]
Université de Lille
Daugs, Robert [Auteur]
Hartmann, Stefan [Auteur]

Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL) - UMR 8163 [STL]
Université de Lille
Daugs, Robert [Auteur]
Hartmann, Stefan [Auteur]
Journal title :
Zeitschrift für Wortbildung / Journal of Word Formation
Pages :
52-75
Publisher :
Peter Lang
Publication date :
2023-04-01
ISSN :
2367-3877
English keyword(s) :
approximation disproximation distributional semantics prefix privativity productivity semantic prosody
approximation
disproximation
distributional semantics
prefix
privativity
productivity
semantic prosody
approximation
disproximation
distributional semantics
prefix
privativity
productivity
semantic prosody
English abstract : [en]
The English prefixes near-, pseudo- and quasi- are privative, in that whatever essential property their morphological base expresses is not strictly possessed by an entity characterized as near-/pseudo-/quasi-X. However, ...
Show more >The English prefixes near-, pseudo- and quasi- are privative, in that whatever essential property their morphological base expresses is not strictly possessed by an entity characterized as near-/pseudo-/quasi-X. However, we claim this meaning is not precise enough and hypothesize that near- and quasi- are approximative in meaning, whereas pseudo- is 'disproximative', expressing the idea of 'falling short' of a standard. Distributional-semantic findings partially support this, as near- shares more bases with quasi- than it does with pseudo-. Near- is most productive, presenting a default choice, while pseudo- is least productive. We also observe a specific tendency of near- to select bases with negative semantic prosody (near-deadly, near-fatal), of quasi- to combine, without any evaluative meaning, with legal-administrative bases (quasi-diplomatic, quasi-governmental), and of pseudo- with terms from the scientific domain. Further qualitative observations about these prefixes are made.Show less >
Show more >The English prefixes near-, pseudo- and quasi- are privative, in that whatever essential property their morphological base expresses is not strictly possessed by an entity characterized as near-/pseudo-/quasi-X. However, we claim this meaning is not precise enough and hypothesize that near- and quasi- are approximative in meaning, whereas pseudo- is 'disproximative', expressing the idea of 'falling short' of a standard. Distributional-semantic findings partially support this, as near- shares more bases with quasi- than it does with pseudo-. Near- is most productive, presenting a default choice, while pseudo- is least productive. We also observe a specific tendency of near- to select bases with negative semantic prosody (near-deadly, near-fatal), of quasi- to combine, without any evaluative meaning, with legal-administrative bases (quasi-diplomatic, quasi-governmental), and of pseudo- with terms from the scientific domain. Further qualitative observations about these prefixes are made.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Popular science :
Non
Collections :
Source :
Files
- document
- Open access
- Access the document
- Cappelle_Daugs_Hartmann_2023_ZWJW.pdf
- Open access
- Access the document