Titre :

Formative Assessment of Diagnostic Testing in Family Medicine with Comprehensive MCQ Followed by Certainty-Based Mark.

Auteur(s) :

Herbaux, Charles [Auteur]
CHU Montpellier = Montpellier University Hospital
425779|||Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Lille] [CHRU Lille]
447578|||University Hospital of Montpellier
Dupré, Aurélie [Auteur]
Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche en Education de Lille - ULR 4354 [CIREL]
Rénier, Wendy [Auteur]
CHU Montpellier = Montpellier University Hospital
Gabellier, Ludovic [Auteur]
CHU Montpellier = Montpellier University Hospital
Chazard, Emmanuel [Auteur]
METRICS : Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694
Lambert, Philippe [Auteur]
CHU Montpellier = Montpellier University Hospital
Sobanski, Vincent [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Gosset, Didier [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Lacroix, Dominique [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Truffert, Patrick [Auteur]
METRICS : Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694

Titre de la revue :

Healthcare (Basel)

Nom court de la revue :

Healthcare (Basel)

Numéro :

10

Date de publication :

2022-08-28

ISSN :

2227-9032

Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :

education
diagnostics

Discipline(s) HAL :

Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]

Résumé en anglais : [en]

Introduction: The choice of diagnostic tests in front of a given clinical case is a major part of medical reasoning. Failure to prescribe the right test can lead to serious diagnostic errors. Furthermore, unnecessary ...
Lire la suite >Introduction: The choice of diagnostic tests in front of a given clinical case is a major part of medical reasoning. Failure to prescribe the right test can lead to serious diagnostic errors. Furthermore, unnecessary medical tests are a waste of money and could possibly generate injuries to patients, especially in family medicine. Methods: In an effort to improve the training of our students to the choice of laboratory and imaging studies, we implemented a specific multiple-choice questions (MCQ), called comprehensive MCQ (cMCQ), with a fixed and high number of options matching various basic medical tests, followed by a certainty-based mark (CBM). This tool was used in the assessment of diagnostic test choice in various clinical cases of general practice in 456 sixth-year medical students. Results: The scores were significantly correlated with the traditional exams (standard MCQ), with matched themes. The proportion of “cMCQ/CBM score” variance explained by “standard MCQ score” was 21.3%. The cMCQ placed students in a situation closer to practice reality than standard MCQ. In addition to its usefulness as an assessment tool, those tests had a formative value and allowed students to work on their ability to measure their doubt/certainty in order to develop a reflexive approach, required for their future professional practice. Conclusion: cMCQ followed by CBM is a feasible and reliable evaluation method for the assessment of diagnostic testing.Lire moins >

Langue :

Anglais

Audience :

Internationale

Vulgarisation :

Non

Établissement(s) :

Université de Lille
CHU Lille

Collections :

• METRICS : Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694

Date de dépôt :

2023-11-15T03:27:07Z
2024-01-16T09:55:37Z