Counterconditioning as a crucible for ...
Document type :
Autre communication scientifique (congrès sans actes - poster - séminaire...): Communication dans un congrès sans actes
Permalink :
Title :
Counterconditioning as a crucible for studying associative interference
Author(s) :
Pena, Tori [Auteur]
Pollack, Cody R. [Auteur]
Berutti, Alaina [Auteur]
Li, Audrey [Auteur]
Binghamton University [SUNY]
Villement, Yoan [Auteur]
Jozefowiez, Jeremie [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Miller, Ralph R. [Auteur]
Binghamton University [SUNY]
Pollack, Cody R. [Auteur]
Berutti, Alaina [Auteur]
Li, Audrey [Auteur]
Binghamton University [SUNY]
Villement, Yoan [Auteur]
Jozefowiez, Jeremie [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Miller, Ralph R. [Auteur]
Binghamton University [SUNY]
Conference title :
Eastern Psychological Association
City :
Philadelphia, PA
Country :
Etats-Unis d'Amérique
Start date of the conference :
2018-03-01
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences cognitives
English abstract : [en]
Counterconditioning (i.e., cue-outcome1 followed by cue-outcome2) is the most traditional instance of associative interference and hence a good preparation to seek general rules of interference. Extinction is rather similar, ...
Show more >Counterconditioning (i.e., cue-outcome1 followed by cue-outcome2) is the most traditional instance of associative interference and hence a good preparation to seek general rules of interference. Extinction is rather similar, although it replaces outcome2 with the absense of any explicit event. Counterconditioning is typically more effective than extinction. However, we failed to find this relationship either with neutraloutcomes or outcomes of opposing valence. Our experiments speak to the role of outcome.Show less >
Show more >Counterconditioning (i.e., cue-outcome1 followed by cue-outcome2) is the most traditional instance of associative interference and hence a good preparation to seek general rules of interference. Extinction is rather similar, although it replaces outcome2 with the absense of any explicit event. Counterconditioning is typically more effective than extinction. However, we failed to find this relationship either with neutraloutcomes or outcomes of opposing valence. Our experiments speak to the role of outcome.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Administrative institution(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
Research team(s) :
Équipe Action, Vision et Apprentissage (AVA)
Submission date :
2023-11-22T15:47:34Z
2023-11-23T09:19:55Z
2023-11-23T09:19:55Z