Centralization and Oncologic Training ...
Type de document :
Compte-rendu et recension critique d'ouvrage
PMID :
Titre :
Centralization and Oncologic Training Reduce Postoperative Morbidity and Failure-to-rescue Rates After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Surface Malignancies: Study on a 10-year National French Practice.
Auteur(s) :
Noiret, Barbara [Auteur]
Hôpital Claude Huriez [Lille]
Clement, Guillaume [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Lenne, Xavier [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Bruandet, Amelie [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Glehen, Olivier [Auteur]
Service d'Oncologie Médicale [Centre hospitalier Lyon Sud - HCL]
Voron, Thibault [Auteur]
CHU Saint-Antoine [AP-HP]
Piessen, Guillaume [Auteur]
Miniaturisation pour la Synthèse, l’Analyse et la Protéomique - UAR 3290 [MSAP]
Eveno, Clarisse [Auteur]
Miniaturisation pour la Synthèse, l’Analyse et la Protéomique - UAR 3290 [MSAP]
Hôpital Claude Huriez [Lille]
Clement, Guillaume [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Lenne, Xavier [Auteur]

Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Bruandet, Amelie [Auteur]

Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Glehen, Olivier [Auteur]
Service d'Oncologie Médicale [Centre hospitalier Lyon Sud - HCL]
Voron, Thibault [Auteur]
CHU Saint-Antoine [AP-HP]
Piessen, Guillaume [Auteur]

Miniaturisation pour la Synthèse, l’Analyse et la Protéomique - UAR 3290 [MSAP]
Eveno, Clarisse [Auteur]

Miniaturisation pour la Synthèse, l’Analyse et la Protéomique - UAR 3290 [MSAP]
Titre de la revue :
Annals of Surgery
Pagination :
847-854
Éditeur :
Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Date de publication :
2020-08-26
ISSN :
0003-4932
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
centralization
cytoreductive surgery
HIPEC
hospital volume
peritoneal surface malignancies
postoperative mortality
cytoreductive surgery
HIPEC
hospital volume
peritoneal surface malignancies
postoperative mortality
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Objective: Evaluate at a national level the postoperative mortality (POM), major morbidity (MM) and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) across ...
Lire la suite >Objective: Evaluate at a national level the postoperative mortality (POM), major morbidity (MM) and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) across time and according to hospital-volume.Background: CRS/HIPEC is an effective therapeutic strategy commonly used to treat peritoneal surface malignancies. However, this aggressive approach has the reputation to be associated with a high POM and MM.Methods: All patients treated with CRS/HIPEC between 2009 and 2018 in France were identified through a national medical database. Patients and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. A cut-off value of the annual CRS/HIPEC caseload affecting the 90-day POM was calculated using the Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector method. A multivariable logistic model was used to identify factors mediating 90-day POM.Results: A total of 7476 CRS/HIPEC were analyzed. Median age was 59 years with a mean Elixhauser comorbidity index of 3.1, both increasing over time (P < 0.001). Ninety-day POM was 2.6%. MM occurred in 44.2% with a FTR rate of 5.1%. The threshold of CRS/HIPEC number per center per year above which the 90-day POM was significantly reduced was 45 (3.2% vs 1.9%, P = 0.01). High-volume centers had more extended surgery (P < 0.001) with increased MM (55.8% vs 40.4%, P < 0.001) but lower FTR (3.1% vs 6.3%, P = 0.001). After multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with 90-day POM were: age >70 years (P = 0.002), Elixhauser comorbidity index ≥8 (P = 0.006), lower gastro-intestinal origin, (P < 0.010), MM (P < 0.001), and <45 procedures/yr (P = 0.002).Conclusion: In France, CRS/HIPEC is a safe procedure with an acceptable 90-day POM that could even be improved through centralization in high-volume centers.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Objective: Evaluate at a national level the postoperative mortality (POM), major morbidity (MM) and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) across time and according to hospital-volume.Background: CRS/HIPEC is an effective therapeutic strategy commonly used to treat peritoneal surface malignancies. However, this aggressive approach has the reputation to be associated with a high POM and MM.Methods: All patients treated with CRS/HIPEC between 2009 and 2018 in France were identified through a national medical database. Patients and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. A cut-off value of the annual CRS/HIPEC caseload affecting the 90-day POM was calculated using the Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector method. A multivariable logistic model was used to identify factors mediating 90-day POM.Results: A total of 7476 CRS/HIPEC were analyzed. Median age was 59 years with a mean Elixhauser comorbidity index of 3.1, both increasing over time (P < 0.001). Ninety-day POM was 2.6%. MM occurred in 44.2% with a FTR rate of 5.1%. The threshold of CRS/HIPEC number per center per year above which the 90-day POM was significantly reduced was 45 (3.2% vs 1.9%, P = 0.01). High-volume centers had more extended surgery (P < 0.001) with increased MM (55.8% vs 40.4%, P < 0.001) but lower FTR (3.1% vs 6.3%, P = 0.001). After multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with 90-day POM were: age >70 years (P = 0.002), Elixhauser comorbidity index ≥8 (P = 0.006), lower gastro-intestinal origin, (P < 0.010), MM (P < 0.001), and <45 procedures/yr (P = 0.002).Conclusion: In France, CRS/HIPEC is a safe procedure with an acceptable 90-day POM that could even be improved through centralization in high-volume centers.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Vulgarisation :
Non
Source :