Does the Relation between Rapid Automatized ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique
DOI :
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
Does the Relation between Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Depend on Age or on Reading Level? A Behavioral and ERP Study
Author(s) :
Cohen, Marjolaine [Auteur]
Université de Genève = University of Geneva [UNIGE]
Mahe, Gwendoline [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Laganaro, Marina [Auteur]
Université de Genève = University of Geneva [UNIGE]
Zesiger, Pascal [Auteur]
Université de Genève = University of Geneva [UNIGE]
Université de Genève = University of Geneva [UNIGE]
Mahe, Gwendoline [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Laganaro, Marina [Auteur]
Université de Genève = University of Geneva [UNIGE]
Zesiger, Pascal [Auteur]
Université de Genève = University of Geneva [UNIGE]
Journal title :
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Abbreviated title :
Front. Hum. Neurosci.
Volume number :
12
Publisher :
Frontiers Media SA
Publication date :
2018-02-22
ISSN :
1662-5161
English keyword(s) :
ERP
French
children
rapid automatized naming (RAN)
reading.
French
children
rapid automatized naming (RAN)
reading.
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences cognitives
English abstract : [en]
Reading predictors evolve through age: phonological awareness is the best predictor of reading abilities at the beginning of reading acquisition while Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) becomes the best reading predictor in ...
Show more >Reading predictors evolve through age: phonological awareness is the best predictor of reading abilities at the beginning of reading acquisition while Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) becomes the best reading predictor in more experienced readers (around 9-10 years old). Those developmental changes in the relationship between RAN and reading have so far been explained in term of participants' age. However, it should be noted that in the previous experiments age always co-vary with participants reading level. It is thus not clear whether RAN-reading relationship is developmental in nature or related to the reading system itself. This study investigates whether the behavioral changes in the relationship between RAN and reading and their electrophysiological correlates are related to the chronological age or to the reading level of the participants. Thirty two French-speaking children aged 7-10 years took part to the experiment: they were divided into groups contrasted on age but with similar reading levels and the other way round. Participants performed two reading tasks and four RAN tasks. EEG/ERP was recorded during discrete letter and picture RAN. Behavioral results revealed that alphanumeric RAN is more sensitive to age variations than reading level differences. The inverse profile was revealed for picture RAN, which discriminate poor and good readers among typically developed children within the same age-group. ERPs of both letter and picture RAN differed across age groups whereas only for the picture RAN ERPs differed across reading levels. Taken together, these results suggest that picture RAN is a particularly good indicator of reading level variance independently of age.Show less >
Show more >Reading predictors evolve through age: phonological awareness is the best predictor of reading abilities at the beginning of reading acquisition while Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) becomes the best reading predictor in more experienced readers (around 9-10 years old). Those developmental changes in the relationship between RAN and reading have so far been explained in term of participants' age. However, it should be noted that in the previous experiments age always co-vary with participants reading level. It is thus not clear whether RAN-reading relationship is developmental in nature or related to the reading system itself. This study investigates whether the behavioral changes in the relationship between RAN and reading and their electrophysiological correlates are related to the chronological age or to the reading level of the participants. Thirty two French-speaking children aged 7-10 years took part to the experiment: they were divided into groups contrasted on age but with similar reading levels and the other way round. Participants performed two reading tasks and four RAN tasks. EEG/ERP was recorded during discrete letter and picture RAN. Behavioral results revealed that alphanumeric RAN is more sensitive to age variations than reading level differences. The inverse profile was revealed for picture RAN, which discriminate poor and good readers among typically developed children within the same age-group. ERPs of both letter and picture RAN differed across age groups whereas only for the picture RAN ERPs differed across reading levels. Taken together, these results suggest that picture RAN is a particularly good indicator of reading level variance independently of age.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
Research team(s) :
Équipe Langage
Submission date :
2023-12-21T18:40:54Z
2024-01-10T17:34:28Z
2024-01-10T17:34:28Z
Files
- Cohen_Mahe_Laganaro_Zesiger_2018_accepted_version.pdf
- Version finale acceptée pour publication (postprint)
- Open access
- Access the document