¿Democratiza el sorteo la democracia? Cómo ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique
DOI :
URL permanente :
Titre :
¿Democratiza el sorteo la democracia? Cómo la democracia deliberativa ha despolitizado una propuesta radical
Auteur(s) :
Talpin, Julien [Auteur]
Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches Administratives, Politiques et Sociales - UMR 8026 [CERAPS]
Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches Administratives, Politiques et Sociales - UMR 8026 [CERAPS]
Titre de la revue :
Daimon, Revista Internacional de Filosofía
Numéro :
72
Pagination :
187-203
Éditeur :
Departamento de Filosofía de la Universidad de Murcia
Date de publication :
2017-12-01
ISSN :
1130-0507
Mot(s)-clé(s) :
History of ideas and knowledge
Deliberation
Deliberative Democracy
Random selection
Sorteo
Democracia deliberativa
Post-democracia
Participación política
Teoría crítica
Deliberation
Deliberative Democracy
Random selection
Sorteo
Democracia deliberativa
Post-democracia
Participación política
Teoría crítica
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Science politique
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Random selection grand come-back in politics in the last forty years is partly due to its incorporation by the theories of deliberative democracy, that have made of randomly selected devices the central forums of deliberation. ...
Lire la suite >Random selection grand come-back in politics in the last forty years is partly due to its incorporation by the theories of deliberative democracy, that have made of randomly selected devices the central forums of deliberation. This integration was, however, far from being self-evident. It stemmed from the scientific trajectory of its proponents and from parallel trends in the political field. Despite, the fresh air random selection brings to representative government, its scientific promotion has not necessarily meant a democratization of democracy however. While such experiments have demonstrated the deliberative capacities of ordinary citizens, they have only exceptionally increased their power in decision-making processes. The focus put by research on the analysis of deliberative dynamics within randomly selected devices has therefore been harshly criticized by some deliberativists who reclaim a needed come back to Habermas’ initial inspiration of a greater deliberation in the public sphere rather than confined in mini-publics. This systemic turn has marginalized random selection within the most recent deliberative theories. After tracing back this intellectual path, I sketch some arguments about the way random selection could rekindle the critical spirit of deliberative theory, mainly through its oppositional use by social movement.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Random selection grand come-back in politics in the last forty years is partly due to its incorporation by the theories of deliberative democracy, that have made of randomly selected devices the central forums of deliberation. This integration was, however, far from being self-evident. It stemmed from the scientific trajectory of its proponents and from parallel trends in the political field. Despite, the fresh air random selection brings to representative government, its scientific promotion has not necessarily meant a democratization of democracy however. While such experiments have demonstrated the deliberative capacities of ordinary citizens, they have only exceptionally increased their power in decision-making processes. The focus put by research on the analysis of deliberative dynamics within randomly selected devices has therefore been harshly criticized by some deliberativists who reclaim a needed come back to Habermas’ initial inspiration of a greater deliberation in the public sphere rather than confined in mini-publics. This systemic turn has marginalized random selection within the most recent deliberative theories. After tracing back this intellectual path, I sketch some arguments about the way random selection could rekindle the critical spirit of deliberative theory, mainly through its oppositional use by social movement.Lire moins >
Langue :
Espagnol
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
CNRS
Université de Lille
Université de Lille
Collections :
Date de dépôt :
2019-10-29T11:37:07Z
2019-10-29T14:31:43Z
2021-12-17T15:27:40Z
2019-10-29T14:31:43Z
2021-12-17T15:27:40Z
Fichiers
- document
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document