Attributing and Referencing (Research) ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique
URL permanente :
Titre :
Attributing and Referencing (Research) Software: Best Practices and Outlook from Inria
Auteur(s) :
Alliez, Pierre [Auteur]
Di Cosmo, Roberto [Auteur]
Guedj, Benjamin [Auteur]
Laboratoire Paul Painlevé - UMR 8524 [LPP]
Girault, Alain [Auteur]
Hacid, Mohand-Said [Auteur]
Legrand, Arnaud [Auteur]
Rougier, Nicolas P. [Auteur]
Di Cosmo, Roberto [Auteur]
Guedj, Benjamin [Auteur]

Laboratoire Paul Painlevé - UMR 8524 [LPP]
Girault, Alain [Auteur]
Hacid, Mohand-Said [Auteur]
Legrand, Arnaud [Auteur]
Rougier, Nicolas P. [Auteur]
Titre de la revue :
Computing in Science & Engineering
Pagination :
1-14
Éditeur :
IEEE
Date de publication :
2019
ISSN :
1558-366X
Mot(s)-clé(s) :
Software reference
Development process
Software citation
Authorship
Reference
Development process
Software citation
Authorship
Reference
Discipline(s) HAL :
Informatique [cs]/Bibliothèque électronique [cs.DL]
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Software is a fundamental pillar of modern scientific research, not only in computer science, but actually across all fields and disciplines. However, there is a lack of adequate means to cite and reference software, for ...
Lire la suite >Software is a fundamental pillar of modern scientific research, not only in computer science, but actually across all fields and disciplines. However, there is a lack of adequate means to cite and reference software, for many reasons. An obvious first reason is software authorship, which can range from a single developer to a whole team, and can even vary in time. The panorama is even more complex than that, because many roles can be involved in software development: software architect, coder, debugger, tester, team manager, and so on. Arguably, the researchers who have invented the key algorithms underlying the software can also claim a part of the authorship. And there are many other reasons that make this issue complex. We provide in this paper a contribution to the ongoing efforts to develop proper guidelines and recommendations for software citation, building upon the internal experience of Inria, the French research institute for digital sciences. As a central contribution, we make three key recommendations. (1) We propose a richer taxonomy for software contributions with a qualitative scale. (2) We claim that it is essential to put the human at the heart of the evaluation. And (3) we propose to distinguish citation from reference.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Software is a fundamental pillar of modern scientific research, not only in computer science, but actually across all fields and disciplines. However, there is a lack of adequate means to cite and reference software, for many reasons. An obvious first reason is software authorship, which can range from a single developer to a whole team, and can even vary in time. The panorama is even more complex than that, because many roles can be involved in software development: software architect, coder, debugger, tester, team manager, and so on. Arguably, the researchers who have invented the key algorithms underlying the software can also claim a part of the authorship. And there are many other reasons that make this issue complex. We provide in this paper a contribution to the ongoing efforts to develop proper guidelines and recommendations for software citation, building upon the internal experience of Inria, the French research institute for digital sciences. As a central contribution, we make three key recommendations. (1) We propose a richer taxonomy for software contributions with a qualitative scale. (2) We claim that it is essential to put the human at the heart of the evaluation. And (3) we propose to distinguish citation from reference.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
CNRS
Université de Lille
Université de Lille
Date de dépôt :
2020-06-08T14:10:45Z
2020-06-09T09:39:23Z
2020-06-09T09:39:23Z
Fichiers
- documen
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document