Associative structure of second-order conditioning in humans.

Craddock, Paul; Wasserman, Jessica S.; Polack, Cody W.; Kosinski, Thierry; Renaux, Charlotte; Miller, Ralph R.

Type de document :

Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original

DOI :

10.3758/s13420-017-0299-5

PMID :

29101727

URL permanente :

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12210/31948

Titre :

Associative structure of second-order conditioning in humans.

Auteur(s) :

Craddock, Paul [Auteur]
Psychologie : Interactions, Temps, Émotions, Cognition (PSITEC) - ULR 4072
Psychologie : Interactions, Temps, Emotions, Cognition (PSITEC) - ULR 4072 [PSITEC]
Wasserman, Jessica S. [Auteur]
Binghamton University [SUNY]
Polack, Cody W. [Auteur]
Binghamton University [SUNY]
Kosinski, Thierry [Auteur]

Psychologie : Interactions, Temps, Emotions, Cognition (PSITEC) - ULR 4072 [PSITEC]
Psychologie : Interactions, Temps, Émotions, Cognition (PSITEC) - ULR 4072
Renaux, Charlotte [Auteur]
Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Miller, Ralph R. [Auteur]
Binghamton University [SUNY]

Titre de la revue :

Learning & Behavior

Numéro :

Pagination :

171-181

Date de publication :

2017

ISSN :

1543-4494

Discipline(s) HAL :

Sciences cognitives

Résumé en anglais : [en]

Second-order conditioning (SOC; i.e., conditioned responding to S2 as a result of S1-US pairings followed by S2-S1 pairings) is generally explained by either a direct S2→US association or by an associative chain (i.e., ...
Lire la suite >Second-order conditioning (SOC; i.e., conditioned responding to S2 as a result of S1-US pairings followed by S2-S1 pairings) is generally explained by either a direct S2→US association or by an associative chain (i.e., S2→S1→US). Previous research found that differences in responses to S2 after S1 was extinguished often depended on the nature of the S2-S1 pairings (i.e., sequential or simultaneous). In two experiments with human participants, we examined the possibility that such differences result from S1 evoking S2 during extinction of S1 following simultaneous but not sequential S2-S1 pairings. This evocation of S2 by S1 following simultaneous pairings may have paired the evoked representation of S2 with absence of the outcome, thereby facilitating mediated extinction of S2. Using sequential S2-S1 pairings, both Experiments 1 and 2 failed to support this account of how extinction of S1 reduced responding to S2. Experiment 1 found that extinguishing S1 reduced responding to S2, while extinguishing S2 had little effect on responses to S1, although forward evocation of S1 during extinction of S2 paired the evoked representation of S1 with absence of the outcome. In Experiment 2, evocation of S2 during S1 nonreinforced trials was prevented because S2-S1 pairings followed (rather than proceeded) S1-alone exposures. Nevertheless, responding to S2 at test mimicked S1 responding. Responding to S2 was high in the context in which S1 had been reinforced and low in the context in which S1 had been nonreinforced. Collectively, these experiments provide additional support for the associative-chain account of SOC.Lire moins >

Langue :

Anglais

Audience :

Internationale

Vulgarisation :

Non

Établissement(s) :

Université de Lille

Collections :

Psychologie : Interactions, Temps, Émotions, Cognition (PSITEC) - ULR 4072

Équipe(s) de recherche :

(D)REC

Date de dépôt :

2020-09-14T10:32:27Z
2021-10-06T07:55:19Z

Numéro de version	Lien	Date de modification
2	20.500.12210/31948*	2021-10-06T07:46:03Z
1	20.500.12210/31948.1	2020-09-14T10:32:27Z

Associative structure of second-order ...

BibTeX

CSV

Excel

RIS

Historique des modifications

Associative structure of second-order ... BibTeX CSV Excel RIS

Historique des modifications

Associative structure of second-order ...

BibTeX

CSV

Excel

RIS