Impact of nutrition route on microaspiration ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Impact of nutrition route on microaspiration in critically ill patients with shock: a planned ancillary study of the nutrirea-2 trial
Auteur(s) :
Nseir, Saad [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Université de Lille
Le Gouge, Amelie [Auteur]
Lascarrou, Jean-Baptiste [Auteur]
Lacherade, Jean-Claude [Auteur]
Jaillette, Emmanuelle [Auteur]
Mira, Jean-Paul [Auteur]
Mercier, Emmanuelle [Auteur]
Declercq, Pierre-Louis [Auteur]
Sirodot, Michel [Auteur]
Piton, Gaël [Auteur]
Tinturier, François [Auteur]
Coupez, Elisabeth [Auteur]
Gaudry, Stéphane [Auteur]
Djibré, Michel [Auteur]
Thevenin, Didier [Auteur]
Pasco, Jeremy [Auteur]
Balduyck, Malika [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Université de Lille
Zerimech, Farid [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Reignier, Jean [Auteur]

Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Université de Lille
Le Gouge, Amelie [Auteur]
Lascarrou, Jean-Baptiste [Auteur]
Lacherade, Jean-Claude [Auteur]
Jaillette, Emmanuelle [Auteur]
Mira, Jean-Paul [Auteur]
Mercier, Emmanuelle [Auteur]
Declercq, Pierre-Louis [Auteur]
Sirodot, Michel [Auteur]
Piton, Gaël [Auteur]
Tinturier, François [Auteur]
Coupez, Elisabeth [Auteur]
Gaudry, Stéphane [Auteur]
Djibré, Michel [Auteur]
Thevenin, Didier [Auteur]
Pasco, Jeremy [Auteur]
Balduyck, Malika [Auteur]

Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Université de Lille
Zerimech, Farid [Auteur]

Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Reignier, Jean [Auteur]
Titre de la revue :
Critical Care
Nom court de la revue :
Crit Care
Numéro :
23
Pagination :
111
Éditeur :
BioMed Central
Date de publication :
2019-04-05
ISSN :
1466-609X
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
Pneumonia
Critical care
Pathophysiology
Microaspiration
Gastric contents
Oropharyngeal secretions
Critical care
Pathophysiology
Microaspiration
Gastric contents
Oropharyngeal secretions
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Alimentation et Nutrition
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Alimentation et Nutrition
Résumé en anglais : [en]
BACKGROUND: Microaspiration of gastric and oropharyngeal secretions is the main mechanism of entry of bacteria into the lower respiratory tract in intubated critically ill patients. The aim of this study is to determine ...
Lire la suite >BACKGROUND: Microaspiration of gastric and oropharyngeal secretions is the main mechanism of entry of bacteria into the lower respiratory tract in intubated critically ill patients. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of enteral nutrition, as compared with parenteral nutrition, on abundant microaspiration of gastric contents and oropharyngeal secretions. METHODS: Planned ancillary study of the randomized controlled multicenter NUTRIREA2 trial. Patients with shock receiving invasive mechanical ventilation were randomized to receive early enteral or parenteral nutrition. All tracheal aspirates were collected during the 48 h following randomization. Abundant microaspiration of gastric contents and oropharyngeal secretions was defined as the presence of significant levels of pepsin (> 200 ng/ml) and salivary amylase (> 1685 UI/ml) in > 30% of tracheal aspirates. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were included (78 and 73 patients in enteral and parenteral nutrition groups, respectively), and 1074 tracheal aspirates were quantitatively analyzed for pepsin and amylase. Although vomiting rate was significantly higher (31% vs 15%, p = 0.016), constipation rate was significantly lower (6% vs 21%, p = 0.010) in patients with enteral than in patients with parenteral nutrition. No significant difference was found regarding other patient characteristics. The percentage of patients with abundant microaspiration of gastric contents was significantly lower in enteral than in parenteral nutrition groups (14% vs 36%, p = 0.004; unadjusted OR 0.80 (95% CI 0.69, 0.93), adjusted OR 0.79 (0.76, 0.94)). The percentage of patients with abundant microaspiration of oropharyngeal secretions was significantly higher in enteral than in parenteral nutrition groups (74% vs 54%, p = 0.026; unadjusted OR 1.21 (95% CI 1.03, 1.44), adjusted OR 1.23 (1.01, 1.48)). No significant difference was found in percentage of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia between enteral (8%) and parenteral (10%) nutrition groups (HR 0.78 (0.26, 2.28)). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that enteral and parenteral nutrition are associated with high rates of microaspiration, although oropharyngeal microaspiration was more common with enteral nutrition and gastric microaspiration was more common with parenteral nutrition.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >BACKGROUND: Microaspiration of gastric and oropharyngeal secretions is the main mechanism of entry of bacteria into the lower respiratory tract in intubated critically ill patients. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of enteral nutrition, as compared with parenteral nutrition, on abundant microaspiration of gastric contents and oropharyngeal secretions. METHODS: Planned ancillary study of the randomized controlled multicenter NUTRIREA2 trial. Patients with shock receiving invasive mechanical ventilation were randomized to receive early enteral or parenteral nutrition. All tracheal aspirates were collected during the 48 h following randomization. Abundant microaspiration of gastric contents and oropharyngeal secretions was defined as the presence of significant levels of pepsin (> 200 ng/ml) and salivary amylase (> 1685 UI/ml) in > 30% of tracheal aspirates. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were included (78 and 73 patients in enteral and parenteral nutrition groups, respectively), and 1074 tracheal aspirates were quantitatively analyzed for pepsin and amylase. Although vomiting rate was significantly higher (31% vs 15%, p = 0.016), constipation rate was significantly lower (6% vs 21%, p = 0.010) in patients with enteral than in patients with parenteral nutrition. No significant difference was found regarding other patient characteristics. The percentage of patients with abundant microaspiration of gastric contents was significantly lower in enteral than in parenteral nutrition groups (14% vs 36%, p = 0.004; unadjusted OR 0.80 (95% CI 0.69, 0.93), adjusted OR 0.79 (0.76, 0.94)). The percentage of patients with abundant microaspiration of oropharyngeal secretions was significantly higher in enteral than in parenteral nutrition groups (74% vs 54%, p = 0.026; unadjusted OR 1.21 (95% CI 1.03, 1.44), adjusted OR 1.23 (1.01, 1.48)). No significant difference was found in percentage of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia between enteral (8%) and parenteral (10%) nutrition groups (HR 0.78 (0.26, 2.28)). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that enteral and parenteral nutrition are associated with high rates of microaspiration, although oropharyngeal microaspiration was more common with enteral nutrition and gastric microaspiration was more common with parenteral nutrition.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Autre(s) projet(s) ou source(s) de financement :
French Ministry of Health, PHRCN-12-0184
Établissement(s) :
CHU Lille
Institut Pasteur de Lille
Université de Lille
Institut Pasteur de Lille
Université de Lille
Collections :
Date de dépôt :
2022-02-02T10:23:55Z
2024-02-20T14:47:10Z
2024-02-20T14:48:53Z
2024-02-20T14:47:10Z
2024-02-20T14:48:53Z
Fichiers
- Nseir et al.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document