Morphological Processing across Modalities ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
Permalink :
Title :
Morphological Processing across Modalities and Languages
Author(s) :
Beyersmann, Elisabeth [Auteur]
Macquarie University
Mousikou, Petroula [Auteur]
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Javourey - Drevet, Ludivine [Auteur]
Activité, Connaissance, Transmission, éducation [ACTé]
Apprentissage, Didactique, Evaluation, Formation [ADEF]
Schroeder, Sascha [Auteur]
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Ziegler, Johannes C. [Auteur]
Laboratoire de psychologie cognitive [LPC]
Grainger, Jonathan [Auteur]
Laboratoire de psychologie cognitive [LPC]
Macquarie University
Mousikou, Petroula [Auteur]
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Javourey - Drevet, Ludivine [Auteur]

Activité, Connaissance, Transmission, éducation [ACTé]
Apprentissage, Didactique, Evaluation, Formation [ADEF]
Schroeder, Sascha [Auteur]
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Ziegler, Johannes C. [Auteur]
Laboratoire de psychologie cognitive [LPC]
Grainger, Jonathan [Auteur]
Laboratoire de psychologie cognitive [LPC]
Journal title :
Scientific Studies of Reading
Volume number :
24
Pages :
500-519
Publisher :
Taylor & Francis (Routledge)
Publication date :
2020-11-01
ISSN :
1088-8438
English keyword(s) :
Morphological processing
Cross-linguistic
Visual lexical decision
Auditory lexical decision
Cross-linguistic
Visual lexical decision
Auditory lexical decision
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Education
English abstract : [en]
The present study examined cross-linguistic differences in morphological processing in the visual and auditory modality. French and German adults performed a visual and auditory lexical decision task that involved the same ...
Show more >The present study examined cross-linguistic differences in morphological processing in the visual and auditory modality. French and German adults performed a visual and auditory lexical decision task that involved the same translation-equivalent items. The focus of the study was on nonwords, which were constructed in a way that the independent role of stems and suffixes in visual and auditory processing could be investigated. Results revealed a stem-by-modality and a suffix-by-modality interaction, indicating a more prominent role for morphology in the visual than in the auditory domain. Moreover, a significant language-by-stem interaction indicated more robust morphological processing in German than in French. The latter result supports the idea that morphological processing is influenced by the morphological productivity of a language.Show less >
Show more >The present study examined cross-linguistic differences in morphological processing in the visual and auditory modality. French and German adults performed a visual and auditory lexical decision task that involved the same translation-equivalent items. The focus of the study was on nonwords, which were constructed in a way that the independent role of stems and suffixes in visual and auditory processing could be investigated. Results revealed a stem-by-modality and a suffix-by-modality interaction, indicating a more prominent role for morphology in the visual than in the auditory domain. Moreover, a significant language-by-stem interaction indicated more robust morphological processing in German than in French. The latter result supports the idea that morphological processing is influenced by the morphological productivity of a language.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Peer reviewed article :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
ANR Project :
Administrative institution(s) :
Université de Lille
Collections :
Submission date :
2022-05-04T15:04:48Z
2022-07-05T09:35:42Z
2022-07-05T09:39:30Z
2022-07-05T09:35:42Z
2022-07-05T09:39:30Z
Files
- document
- Open access
- Access the document