Bone Marrow Adiposity and Fragility Fractures ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
DOI :
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Bone Marrow Adiposity and Fragility Fractures in Postmenopausal Women: The ADIMOS Case-Control Study.
Auteur(s) :
Paccou, Julien [Auteur]
Marrow Adiposity & Bone Lab [MABLab] - ULR 4490
Badr, Sammy [Auteur]
Marrow Adiposity & Bone Lab - Adiposité Médullaire et Os - ULR 4490 [MABLab]
Lombardo, Daniela [Auteur]
Marrow Adiposity & Bone Lab - Adiposité Médullaire et Os - ULR 4490 [MABLab]
Khizindar, Huda [Auteur]
Marrow Adiposity & Bone Lab - Adiposité Médullaire et Os - ULR 4490 [MABLab]
Deken, Valerie [Auteur]
METRICS : Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694
Ruschke, Stefan [Auteur]
University of Applied Sciences [Munich]
Karampinos, Dimitrios C. [Auteur]
University of Applied Sciences [Munich]
Cotten, Anne [Auteur]
Marrow Adiposity & Bone Lab - Adiposité Médullaire et Os - ULR 4490 [MABLab]
Cortet, Bernard [Auteur]
Marrow Adiposity & Bone Lab (MABLab) - ULR 4490

Marrow Adiposity & Bone Lab [MABLab] - ULR 4490
Badr, Sammy [Auteur]
Marrow Adiposity & Bone Lab - Adiposité Médullaire et Os - ULR 4490 [MABLab]
Lombardo, Daniela [Auteur]
Marrow Adiposity & Bone Lab - Adiposité Médullaire et Os - ULR 4490 [MABLab]
Khizindar, Huda [Auteur]
Marrow Adiposity & Bone Lab - Adiposité Médullaire et Os - ULR 4490 [MABLab]
Deken, Valerie [Auteur]

METRICS : Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694
Ruschke, Stefan [Auteur]
University of Applied Sciences [Munich]
Karampinos, Dimitrios C. [Auteur]
University of Applied Sciences [Munich]
Cotten, Anne [Auteur]

Marrow Adiposity & Bone Lab - Adiposité Médullaire et Os - ULR 4490 [MABLab]
Cortet, Bernard [Auteur]

Marrow Adiposity & Bone Lab (MABLab) - ULR 4490
Titre de la revue :
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
Nom court de la revue :
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
Date de publication :
2023-04-05
ISSN :
1945-7197
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
osteoporosis
fracture
bone marrow adipose tissue
bone mineral density
fracture
bone marrow adipose tissue
bone mineral density
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Context
Noninvasive assessment of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may improve the prediction of fractures.
Objective
This work aimed to determine if an association exists between ...
Lire la suite >Context Noninvasive assessment of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may improve the prediction of fractures. Objective This work aimed to determine if an association exists between PDFF and fractures. Methods A case-control study was conducted at Lille University Hospital, Lille, France, with 2 groups of postmenopausal women: one with recent osteoporotic fractures, and the other with no fractures. Lumbar spine and proximal femur (femoral head, neck, and diaphysis) PDFF were determined using chemical shift-based water-fat separation MRI (WFI) and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans of the lumbar spine and hip. Our primary objective was to determine the relationship between lumbar spine PDFF and osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women. Analysis of covariance was used to compare PDFF measurements between patient cases (overall and according to the type of fracture) and controls, after adjusting for age, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and BMD. Results In 199 participants, controls (n = 99) were significantly younger (P < .001) and had significantly higher BMD (P < 0.001 for all sites) than patient cases (n = 100). A total of 52 women with clinical vertebral fractures and 48 with nonvertebral fractures were included. When PDFFs in patient cases and controls were compared, after adjustment on age, CCI, and BMD, no statistically significant differences between the groups were found at the lumbar spine or proximal femur. When PDFFs in participants with clinical vertebral fractures (n = 52) and controls were compared, femoral neck PDFF and femoral diaphysis PDFF were detected to be lower in participants with clinical vertebral fractures than in controls (adjusted mean [SE] 79.3% [1.2] vs 83.0% [0.8]; P = 0.020, and 77.7% [1.4] vs 81.6% [0.9]; P = 0.029, respectively). Conclusion No difference in lumbar spine PDFF was found between those with osteoporotic fractures and controls. However, imaging-based proximal femur PDFF may discriminate between postmenopausal women with and without clinical vertebral fractures, independently of age, CCI, and BMD.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Context Noninvasive assessment of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may improve the prediction of fractures. Objective This work aimed to determine if an association exists between PDFF and fractures. Methods A case-control study was conducted at Lille University Hospital, Lille, France, with 2 groups of postmenopausal women: one with recent osteoporotic fractures, and the other with no fractures. Lumbar spine and proximal femur (femoral head, neck, and diaphysis) PDFF were determined using chemical shift-based water-fat separation MRI (WFI) and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans of the lumbar spine and hip. Our primary objective was to determine the relationship between lumbar spine PDFF and osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women. Analysis of covariance was used to compare PDFF measurements between patient cases (overall and according to the type of fracture) and controls, after adjusting for age, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and BMD. Results In 199 participants, controls (n = 99) were significantly younger (P < .001) and had significantly higher BMD (P < 0.001 for all sites) than patient cases (n = 100). A total of 52 women with clinical vertebral fractures and 48 with nonvertebral fractures were included. When PDFFs in patient cases and controls were compared, after adjustment on age, CCI, and BMD, no statistically significant differences between the groups were found at the lumbar spine or proximal femur. When PDFFs in participants with clinical vertebral fractures (n = 52) and controls were compared, femoral neck PDFF and femoral diaphysis PDFF were detected to be lower in participants with clinical vertebral fractures than in controls (adjusted mean [SE] 79.3% [1.2] vs 83.0% [0.8]; P = 0.020, and 77.7% [1.4] vs 81.6% [0.9]; P = 0.029, respectively). Conclusion No difference in lumbar spine PDFF was found between those with osteoporotic fractures and controls. However, imaging-based proximal femur PDFF may discriminate between postmenopausal women with and without clinical vertebral fractures, independently of age, CCI, and BMD.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
CHU Lille
CHU Lille
Collections :
Date de dépôt :
2023-11-15T02:14:48Z
2024-04-04T12:22:28Z
2024-04-04T12:54:31Z
2024-04-04T12:22:28Z
2024-04-04T12:54:31Z