Clinical Implications of Vertebral Endplate ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
DOI :
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Clinical Implications of Vertebral Endplate Disruptions After Lumbar Discectomy: 3-Year Results from a Randomized Trial of a Bone-Anchored Annular Closure Device
Auteur(s) :
Kursumovic, A. [Auteur]
Bouma, G. J. [Auteur]
Miller, L. E. [Auteur]
Assaker, Richard [Auteur]
Protéomique, Réponse Inflammatoire, Spectrométrie de Masse (PRISM) - U1192
Van De Kelft, E. [Auteur]
Hes, R. [Auteur]
Kienzler, J. C. [Auteur]
Bouma, G. J. [Auteur]
Miller, L. E. [Auteur]
Assaker, Richard [Auteur]
Protéomique, Réponse Inflammatoire, Spectrométrie de Masse (PRISM) - U1192
Van De Kelft, E. [Auteur]
Hes, R. [Auteur]
Kienzler, J. C. [Auteur]
Titre de la revue :
Journal of Pain Research
Nom court de la revue :
J. Pain Res.
Numéro :
13
Pagination :
669-675
Date de publication :
2020-04-18
ISSN :
1178-7090
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
annular closure
disc herniation
lumbar discectomy
randomized controlled trial
sciatica
vertebral endplate
disc herniation
lumbar discectomy
randomized controlled trial
sciatica
vertebral endplate
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Objective: Vertebral endplate disruptions (VEPD) are common findings on imaging after
lumbar surgery. The objective of this study was to explore the clinical implications of VEPD
development following lumbar discectomy ...
Lire la suite >Objective: Vertebral endplate disruptions (VEPD) are common findings on imaging after lumbar surgery. The objective of this study was to explore the clinical implications of VEPD development following lumbar discectomy with or without implant with a bone-anchored annular closure device (ACD). Methods: This was a multicenter randomized controlled trial of patients with large postsurgical annular defects after limited lumbar discectomy who were randomized to additionally receive an ACD or no additional treatment. VEPD were identified on computed tomography and confirmed by an imaging core laboratory. Clinical outcomes included recurrent herniation, reoperation, Oswestry Disability Index, leg pain, and back pain. Patient follow-up in this study was 3 years. Results: In the ACD group (n=272), the risk of reoperation was lower in patients with vs without VEPD (8% vs 24%, p<0.01), but no other clinical outcomes differed when stratified by VEPD prevalence or size. In the Control group (n=278), the risk of symptomatic reherniation was higher in patients with VEPD (41% vs 23%, p<0.01) and patients with the largest VEPD had the highest reoperation rates. Patient-reported outcomes were not associated with VEPD prevalence or size in the Control group. Conclusion: VEPD had no significant influence on patient-reported outcomes at 3 years after lumbar discectomy. VEPD increased the risk of recurrence in patients treated with lumbar discectomy only, but had no negative influence in patients treated with the ACD.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Objective: Vertebral endplate disruptions (VEPD) are common findings on imaging after lumbar surgery. The objective of this study was to explore the clinical implications of VEPD development following lumbar discectomy with or without implant with a bone-anchored annular closure device (ACD). Methods: This was a multicenter randomized controlled trial of patients with large postsurgical annular defects after limited lumbar discectomy who were randomized to additionally receive an ACD or no additional treatment. VEPD were identified on computed tomography and confirmed by an imaging core laboratory. Clinical outcomes included recurrent herniation, reoperation, Oswestry Disability Index, leg pain, and back pain. Patient follow-up in this study was 3 years. Results: In the ACD group (n=272), the risk of reoperation was lower in patients with vs without VEPD (8% vs 24%, p<0.01), but no other clinical outcomes differed when stratified by VEPD prevalence or size. In the Control group (n=278), the risk of symptomatic reherniation was higher in patients with VEPD (41% vs 23%, p<0.01) and patients with the largest VEPD had the highest reoperation rates. Patient-reported outcomes were not associated with VEPD prevalence or size in the Control group. Conclusion: VEPD had no significant influence on patient-reported outcomes at 3 years after lumbar discectomy. VEPD increased the risk of recurrence in patients treated with lumbar discectomy only, but had no negative influence in patients treated with the ACD.Lire moins >
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
Inserm
CHU Lille
Inserm
CHU Lille
Date de dépôt :
2023-12-13T05:29:48Z
2024-01-24T15:15:31Z
2024-01-24T15:15:31Z
Fichiers
- jpr-226480-clinical-implications-of-vertebral-endplate-disruptions-afte.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document