Impact of the new meld-based allocation ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
DOI :
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
Impact of the new meld-based allocation system on waiting list and post-transplant survival - a cohort analysis using the french national cristal database
Author(s) :
Jasseron, Carine [Auteur]
Agence de la biomédecine [Saint-Denis la Plaine]
Francoz, Claire [Auteur]
Centre de recherche biomédicale Bichat-Beaujon [CRB3]
Antoine, Corinne [Auteur]
Agence de la biomédecine [Saint-Denis la Plaine]
Legeai, Camille [Auteur]
Agence de la biomédecine [Saint-Denis la Plaine]
Durand, Francois [Auteur]
Centre de recherche biomédicale Bichat-Beaujon [CRB3]
Dharancy, Sebastien [Auteur]
Lille Inflammation Research International Center - U 995 [LIRIC]
Agence de la biomédecine [Saint-Denis la Plaine]
Francoz, Claire [Auteur]
Centre de recherche biomédicale Bichat-Beaujon [CRB3]
Antoine, Corinne [Auteur]
Agence de la biomédecine [Saint-Denis la Plaine]
Legeai, Camille [Auteur]
Agence de la biomédecine [Saint-Denis la Plaine]
Durand, Francois [Auteur]
Centre de recherche biomédicale Bichat-Beaujon [CRB3]
Dharancy, Sebastien [Auteur]
Lille Inflammation Research International Center - U 995 [LIRIC]
Journal title :
Transplant International
Abbreviated title :
Transpl. Int.
Volume number :
32
Pages :
1061-1073
Publication date :
2019-10
ISSN :
1432-2277
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
Concerns related to equity and efficacy of our previous center-based allocation system have led us to introduce a patient-based allocation system called the "Liver Score" that incorporates the MELD score. The main objective ...
Show more >Concerns related to equity and efficacy of our previous center-based allocation system have led us to introduce a patient-based allocation system called the "Liver Score" that incorporates the MELD score. The main objective of this study was to compare waitlist and post-transplant survivals before and after implementation of the "Liver Score" using the French transplant registry (period before: 2004-2006 and period after: 2007-2012). Patients transplanted during the second period were sicker and had a higher MELD. One-year waitlist survival (74% versus 76%; p=0.8) and one-year post-transplant survival (86.3% vs 85.7%; p=0.5) were similar between the 2 periods. Cirrhotic recipients with MELD>35 had lower one-year post-transplant survival compared to those with MELD<35 (74.8% vs 86.3%; p<0.01), mainly explained by their higher intubation and renal failure rates. The MELD showed a poor discriminative capacity. In cirrhotic recipients with MELD>35, patients presenting 2 or 3 risk factors (dialysis, intubation or infection) had a lower 1-year survival compared to those with none of these risk factors (61.2% vs 92%; p<0.01). The implementation of the MELD-based allocation system has led to transplant sicker patients with no impact on waitlist and post-transplant survivals. Nevertheless, selection of patients with MELD>35 should be completed to allow safe transplantation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.Show less >
Show more >Concerns related to equity and efficacy of our previous center-based allocation system have led us to introduce a patient-based allocation system called the "Liver Score" that incorporates the MELD score. The main objective of this study was to compare waitlist and post-transplant survivals before and after implementation of the "Liver Score" using the French transplant registry (period before: 2004-2006 and period after: 2007-2012). Patients transplanted during the second period were sicker and had a higher MELD. One-year waitlist survival (74% versus 76%; p=0.8) and one-year post-transplant survival (86.3% vs 85.7%; p=0.5) were similar between the 2 periods. Cirrhotic recipients with MELD>35 had lower one-year post-transplant survival compared to those with MELD<35 (74.8% vs 86.3%; p<0.01), mainly explained by their higher intubation and renal failure rates. The MELD showed a poor discriminative capacity. In cirrhotic recipients with MELD>35, patients presenting 2 or 3 risk factors (dialysis, intubation or infection) had a lower 1-year survival compared to those with none of these risk factors (61.2% vs 92%; p<0.01). The implementation of the MELD-based allocation system has led to transplant sicker patients with no impact on waitlist and post-transplant survivals. Nevertheless, selection of patients with MELD>35 should be completed to allow safe transplantation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
CHU Lille
Inserm
Université de Lille
Inserm
Université de Lille
Submission date :
2024-01-30T10:26:30Z
2024-03-22T15:05:58Z
2024-03-22T15:05:58Z